Making Arguments with Data

Resisting Appropriation and Assumption of Access/Reason in Machine Learning Training Processes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34669/WI.WJDS/3.2.4

Keywords:

Ethics of digital tools, digital equity, critical data studies, data observatories, assumption of access, appropriation, classification, situated knowledge, machine learning, artificial intelligence

Abstract

This article presents an approach to practicing ethics when working with large datasets and designing data representations. Inspired by feminist critique of technoscience and recent problematizations of digital literacy, we argue that machine learning models can be navigated in a multi-narrative manner when access to training data is well articulated and understood. We programmed and used web-based interfaces to sort, organize, and explore a community-run digital archive of radio signals. An additional perspective on the question of working with datasets is offered from the experience of teaching image synthesis with freely accessible online tools. We hold that the main challenge to social transformations related to digital technologies comes from lingering forms of colonialism and extractive relationships that easily move in and out of the digital domain. To counter both the unfounded narratives of techno-optimism and the universalizing critique of technology, we discuss an approach to data and networks that enables a situated critique of datafication and correlationism from within.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Published

30-10-2023

How to Cite

Savic, S., & Martins, Y. P. (2023). Making Arguments with Data: Resisting Appropriation and Assumption of Access/Reason in Machine Learning Training Processes. Weizenbaum Journal of the Digital Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.34669/WI.WJDS/3.2.4

Issue

Section

Research Papers