Top

Innovating Democracy? Analyzing the #WirVsVirus Hackathon

Authors

Thorsten Thiel
University of Erfurt, Germany
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4261-118X
Sebastian Berg
WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Germany
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0335-275X
Niklas Rakowski
Weizenbaum Institute, Berlin, Germany
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3674-8583
Veza Clute-Simon
Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1046-3051

Files

PDF Read in browser

Abstract

The article concerns the case of #WirVsVirus, a civic hackathon organized in reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic and officially endorsed by Germany’s federal government. It aims to address the normative implications of this politically oriented technological format. Specifically, it asks how civic hackathons formulate and negotiate different political representation claims. Our analysis shows that the hackathon constituted a successful representative claim on behalf of civic tech initiatives vis-à-vis the administrative state. While this claim primarily concerned establishing a new format for efficient and subsidiary problem-solving in the wake of the crisis, the hackathon’s participatory promises have only been partially fulfilled. The hackathon was rather open to input from civil society, enabling it to attract substantial public interest. Nonetheless, its technological-organizational structure and competitive, solution-oriented procedures meant that decision-making power remained largely with the hackathon’s organizers.

PDF Read in browser

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Details